Monday, October 10, 2016

Charlie T. – Participant Learner: First Sessions

10-10-2016
RDLG537-01
Rachel Pinkstone – Tutoring & Reflection Journal
(Word count: 1202, 6 pages double-spaced)


 “Charlie T. – Participant Learner”

Overview
Within two weeks, I have completed two tutoring sessions with my “participant learner,” Charlie, each averaging 45 minutes to an hour of activity and assessment. Charlie’s family has a very busy schedule, so our time together must be fast, efficient, and effective. As I cannot observe Charlie within the classroom, our sessions consist of discussion about his classroom experience, an assessment activity, and then a game. I make a point of creating a relaxed and fun atmosphere during the assessment so as not to make Charlie feel as though he is being tested or that he is under pressure.
Even this early in the process, I have realized that assessing children can be unreliable, as the performance of a child Charlie’s age is not necessarily consistent even during a short tutoring session, and that emotional influences can greatly affect his attention span and retention skills. During the first session, Charlie was shy and hesitant with participation, but after some success through the assessment activities, he became more comfortable. Subsequently, our second session started with more ease, as Charlie conveyed more self-assurance and familiarity with the flow and purpose of our meetings.

Lessons/Assessments
Session One
Our first session began with a more conversationally dense introduction. I reminded Charlie that I was also in school learning to be a teacher. After my re-introduction, I began an informal interview of my student. Charlie shared his enthusiasm and excitement for schooling. Concerning his literacy education within class time, Charlie participates in several book “read aloud” activities daily, plus alphabet recognition and print concept activities using a small, individual sandbox to draw out letters. They also visit the library to take out books for individual “reading time,” and they use the computer for education activities.
At home, Charlie works with his parents to hone these skills. For homework, Charlie practices writing letters and numbers on a white board using a thick marker, which also helps his motor skills. In the evenings with his mother, Charlie “reads” two of his favorite books, Chicka Chicka Boom Boom (Martin Jr., 1989) and Hop on Pop (Seuss, 1963). Laura, Charlie’s mother, indicates that he has a good portion of these books memorized, but she encourages him to follow the line of print with his finger as he recites from memory what he knows is on the page from repetition.

Assessments
After the interview, Charlie and I participate in a read aloud of One Fish, Two Fish by Dr.
Seuss. For a short lesson using the book, I have Charlie seek a few letters that he knows on each page. Charlie is immediately successful with the letters contained in his own name, which he most often writes and sees. However, he is very confident with the entire alphabet.

Letter Names Assessment
Using Charlie’s white board and dry erase marker, I created two lines of print (including upper case and lower case letters) and asked Charlie to identify letter names. The following lines of print were provided:

F          c          R         E          L          m         A         B

H         O         z          T         y          w         I           G

Charlie successfully identified all of the letters on the list and did not seem to have any trouble with both cases being used.

Letter Sounds Assessment
Next, with the same two lines of print (including upper case and lower case letters), I asked Charlie to identify the letter sounds.

F          c          R         E          L          m         A         B

H         O         z          T         y          w         I           G

Again, Charlie showed a strong skill for identifying the sounds for the provided letters, including the long and short vowel sounds. However, he struggled slightly to remember the soft “c” pronunciation. I came to the realization that he does not practice many words that start with that sound using that letter, as apposed to words beginning with the letter “s.” We addressed this through the practice of stating that he “lives in the city,” with an emphasis on the “C.”
For a rewarding brain break after our lessons, Charlie and I sang and danced through the song “Head, Shoulders, Knees and Toes.”

Session Two

For our second session, I met with Charlie after he and his family returned from his soccer game on a Saturday. As opposed to our first meeting the week before, his attention span was slightly harder to maintain; however, he showed a greater deal of comfort with my presence and our work together. Charlie’s mother also told me that homework has become a regular assignment to practice the “Letter of the Week” and the “Sight word of the Week,” and that they are using a computer program called “Lexia” to play word games in class. For this session I chose a book for a guided reading lesson. Guided reading is “research-based, professionally energized, highly targeted, scaffolded reading instruction that propels all students toward confident, independent reading of high quality grade level books across a diverse array of literature and informational genres” (Fountas and Pinnell, 1996). In order to introduce this more focused activity of reading, I chose Charlie’s book, Clifford Goes to Dog School (Bridwell, 2002).

High Frequency Sight Word Assessment
Using Charlie’s white board and dry erase marker, I wrote down the following high frequency sight words from the text:

I           he        she       dog      can      was      can      sit        stay      school  Clifford

After having Charlie recite each word several times, we then reread the story together having Charlie alone read the high frequency words when they came up in the text. Charlie was excited to be a part of the reading process and anticipated his sight words as we read together. This session was slightly more challenging due to Charlie’s excitable mood after his soccer game, so we concluded the tutoring portion of our session after this final assessment.

To end our Saturday session, we played two rounds of the game “I Spy,” where, using the white board, I wrote down the color of the item he was looking for and had him repeat the word back to me before making his guesses. And although he knows that he’s still learning through this game, he makes sure to make as many guesses as possible to extend the time playing the game.

Conclusion
Charlie shows an aptitude and excitement for reading and writing. At the age of 5, Charlie is just entering into the basics of a Level 1 reader, according to the NAEP Oral Reading Fluency Scale, but he shows strong phonemic and graphemic awareness. I am confident that his kindergarten instruction has him on a timely learning schedule for word recognition and sight word automaticity. He is also an expressive young man, so through recitation, guided reading, and the addition of choral reading strategies, I believe he will find himself “ahead of the game” when it comes to fluency through interpretive and meaningful reading. In our next session, I will provide a lesson plan that includes choral reading and decoding for blending compound words and syllables.
            Through these two sessions, I have also learned a great deal about myself as an educator. In my current professional career, strict time management guides my day-to-day activities and this is a skill I need to translate into my tutoring sessions, particularly on days when Charlie is especially willful and distracted. Strategic “brain breaks,” games, and time for feedback from my student will continue to be important tools for my instruction.


Works Sited

Fountas and Pinnell, Guided Reading: Good First Teaching for All Children, 1996.